Simple Church Journal

  • The Insider, Chapter 1

    I want to highlight key points from Jim Petersen’s The Insider as I read it. From chapter 1:

    God has purposes and He is working them out.

    We all need to live for something. It’s contrary to our nature to be content if we feel our lives are not counting for something that is bigger than life! God made us this way. Whatever the earthly value of our achievements, if we do not feel that what we’re working on somehow transcends the here and now, we find ourselves struggling with feelings of futility. This is a universal phenomenon that runs through all of human history.

    We often don’t feel like we have a part because it seems like “the main feature in most Christians’ lives today is congregating. This makes most of us passive participants.”

    The purpose of this book is:

    We want to help people… understand their calling to participate in what God is doing today. We want people to see that this calling is to be worked out within their existing relational networks where they are already positioned as insiders. God intends that every part of our daily life should line up with his purposes, to his glory. We believe this is something that is within reach for all of us, not just the gifted few.

  • Beginning Blogging

    Bill Hays wrote me this email:

    Hey Roger,

    Just popping in to say hi and ask for some advice on beginning blogging. I
    know nothing about it and had to look it up in a dictionary. I have really
    enjoyed yours and the idea of sharing thoughts with others is enticing. Not
    sure how much criticism I can take, though. I’m sure you get your share.

    How does it all work? Like I have the time to work on it…I’m hoping it
    might encourage me to keep away from the TV when I travel (usually 3 or 4
    days/wk.) Can you give me some links to “How to…”. Do you have a favorite
    hosting service?

    For those interested, I thought I would go ahead and post my reply to Bill:

    Hey Bill,
    I can tell you what little I know… I’m still a novice myself.
    A couple of interesting articles on blogging:
    http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/03/15/new.web/index.html
    And
    http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/03/15/new.web/index.html

    That last article discusses RSS feeds which, to me, is really at the heart of blogging. These allow you to keep track of blogs and read them easily… Making blogdom very efficient.

    If you are not familiar with RSS feeds, I suggest that you get a RSS news aggregator and begin seeing how they interface with blogs. You can use a free online-based one at www.bloglines.com or download a trial software-based one from www.feeddemon.com (I know… Not-so-great name). I have personally settled in at bloglines and have been happy with it.

    The point of understanding how news aggregators collect blog info and let you read it is because you definitely want to set up a blog that allows others to “feed” off of your posts by providing an RSS feed from your website.

    Now, if that sounds difficult, it’s not if you want to use the most user-friendly blog software out there… Which is what I use: www.typepad.com.
    This is the easiest, user-friendly way to set up a blog that I know of. The only downside is that there is a small monthly fee for their services. But they make setting up a blog, as well as the RSS feed, simple.

    The other, most commonly used blog set-up sight is www.blogger.com. Since I don’t use this one I can’t tell you much about it other than I believe it is free– a definite benefit. Many people seem to be happy with what they provide.

    If you are very, very techy, you can become much more sophisticated and learn how to create blogs using many, many different web-building tools. But I’m not the one to help anyone with the fancy tech stuff. Frankly, the reason that blogs are becoming “mainstream” is because sites like the ones mentioned above have given us “ordinary” computer people access to the technology.

    There are many, many other places to get info on blogs: www.jordoncooper.com has a large variety of great blogging material and he also keeps current on blogging info.

    I hope this is a help.

    I should mention, by the way, that typepad.com– the provider that I use– does make it easy to post blogs via email (you mentioned that you might be writing from the road). I assume others have the same capability but you may want to check that out before setting your blog up.

    I think I’ll post this info on my websites… Blessed Blogging To You, Roger

  • Why Change Church?

    Here’s a repeat from a post dated Feb. 18– just wanted to share it again:

    Why Change Church?

    Alan Creech seeks to answer the important question, “why we do church a different way.” His response is this:

    We have looked and we have seen the deep lack of real transformation going on in the Body of Christ. We aren’t – we haven’t been – being changed into the people we were created to be. And we have seen that the context of our Christian lives has had a good deal to do with this lack of transformation.
    I agree with Alan and would add that, not only are we not seeing transformation, we are not seeing the full expression of what Christ’s Body, family, community is meant to look like. The church is the expression of God’s people. The church is the people. The church ought to be the expression of the full diversity of God’s people and the community that they live in with each other. Instead, the church has often limited the expressions of God’s people, and the nature of community.

    In my own experience, I felt that God gave me the ability to run and the church offered me a track to run on– around and around. It took me many years to discover that, no, I was meant to run cross country… off the circular track. The church had no capacity to facilitate this diversity. It has limited the diversity of God’s people rather than served it.

    The first century church was not a static “thing,” rather, by defintion, it was a living, missional, people-movement. The church took it’s shape from the people who were being moved by the Spirit, seeking to live in relationship with God, fulfill His purposes, and live in love-one-another community. God’s diverse people, led by the Spirit (along with principles and truth), became the definition of what the church was. Structures accomodated the movement.

    In contrast, today, we usually see structure define the church. In this context, there is no room for the full and rich diversity of the “movement of the Spirit through God’s people.” What a tragic loss to both God’s people and the world God longs to touch. How sad it is to travel the globe and see the exact same church structures which now limit the movement (and the diverse expression of Christ through His people) rather than respond to it and support it.

    So… my added response to Alan’s comments about wanting to see God’s people transformed is: Yes, and amen. And… I long to see God more fully expressed through His people so that, indeed, His glory will cover the earth.

  • Amos on Religion

    From Rachelle over at Truth Seeker–

    Things I read in the Bible today that I swear to God were not in there before Eugene Peterson learned how to type:

    “I can’t stand your religious meetings.
    I’m fed up with your conferences and conventions.
    I want nothing to do with your religion projects,
    your pretntious slogans and goals.
    I’m sick of your fund-raising schemes,
    your public relations and image making.
    I’ve had all I can take of your noisy ego-music.
    When was the last time you sang to me?
    Do you know what I want?
    I want justice — oceans of it.
    I want fairness — rivers of it.
    That’s what I want. That’s all I want. ” Amos 5

  • Article From a Church Planter

    Here is an article from Jeff Gilbertson, a YWAM church planter in Central Asia, that was passed along to me by John White:

    Dear Saints,

    One of the best descriptions we can find of an early church “gathering” is found in Acts 20:7,11:

    “And on the first day of the week, when we gathered to break bread, Paul began talking to them…when he had gone back up, and had broken bread and eaten, he talked with them a long while.”

    Unfortunately, this brief description of the early church is often overlooked. In some way this situation reminds me of the initial days of the Internet, when people used to say: “You can find that book at http://www. amazon. com”. Later they would shorten that and say: “www.amazon.com”. Now, of course, it is just: “amazon.com” (sometimes just: “ebay”, “google”, etc.). We intuitively know what the speaker is saying, having followed the progressions ourselves!

    Herein is precisely our problem when we try to put together “snapshots” of the New Testament church and how they met and functioned from the NT. We were not there to live through the NT expansion of church life! When we read of it in the Scriptures, the apostolic authors cut short their communication when referring to the churches they have planted and watered. They are not trying to paint a picture of the way churches should meet, for how long, or their size, etc. but correct things that have gone awry or simply recount church history. This leads to us – nearly 2000 years later- paying little attention to vital church life clues! I often wonder if, over the centuries, we have “strained out the gnat, and swallowed the camel” in this regard…

    In this snapshot from Acts 20, though, I find three key ingredients that have great significance for today.

    1. They gathered together on the first day of the week…

    As we know from history the Jewish day was from 6 pm to 6pm. The early church gathered together in the evening of the “first day” of the week, evidently a carry-over from the weekly rhythm/flow of the Old Testament Sabbath. St. John wrote that he was “caught up in the Spirit on the Lord’s Day” (Rev. 1:10), which most scholars today equate with the first day of the week.

    I think we can assume then that the apostolic pattern then was to start churches that kept to a weekly flow of gathering together once a week. They also met in different ways throughout the week to have fellowship and pray but once a week they all met together. I think we have followed this practice quite well even to the present day!

    2. They gathered together on the first day of the week to break bread…

    Here you may be very surprised where we haven’t gotten the apostolic practice down quite so well. For Luke, writing in apostolic “dot.com shorthand”, just records that the church in Troas waited a whole week to gather together again and the reason they met was to break bread. Period!… not to worship, pray, give, fellowship, or to listen to a sermon!! How can this be? “They meet to eat!??!” Incredible!

    “ They did not think that religion was meant only for Sundays, and for what men now-a-days call the ‘House of God’. Their own houses were houses of God, and their own meals were so mixed and mingled with the Lord’s Supper that to this day, the most cautious student of the Bible cannot tell when they left over-eating their common meals, and when they began eating the Supper of the Lord.” (C. H. Spurgeon, 1874)

    What was unmistakably a big part of the early church lifestyle has become a mere “token practice” in our day, completely devoid of the very setting that would make it meaningful! “To simply explain ‘the breaking of bread’ as ‘the Holy Communion’ is to pervert the plain meaning of words, and to mar the picture of family life, which the text places before us as the ideal of the early believers”. (Page- emphasis mine)

    3. They gathered together in homes and talked with each other…

    Although Paul was to leave the next day for a very long time and spoke into the wee hours (so long that he put the young man Eutychus fast asleep), this should not be considered the norm for a first century home gathering. What is more, the words “talked to them” (which the KJV regrettably translated “preached unto them”) is dialegomai in the Greek, from which we get our English word dialogue. A synonym for dialogue is an exchange of ideas! The great apostle Paul talked, but then they asked questions, Paul talked some more, others talked, they all sang and prayed, they ate food and broke bread. This same Greek word is used of the disciples who “discussed with one another” other about who would be the greatest (Mk 9). Clearly they weren’t “preaching unto” each other!

    Without a doubt, we know that God gave teachers to the Body (Eph 4:11) and that the elders were called to teach (I Tim 3), but we also must practice the art of “When you assemble, each one has a hymn, a teaching…” (1 Cor 14:26)

    So, where does this leave us now?

    If we want to be Biblically-oriented, orthodox believers we need to look afresh at every description of NT church gatherings and try our best to reproduce it today! This obviously doesn’t mean we need to speak Greek or wear robes and sandals, BUT we must do that which reproduces church more like a family gathering than an institutional one. As one house church planter has observed: “Size is the real issue. The church should [have]… more participation, closer interaction, more accountability, more commitment and closer relationships.” (Dick Scoggins, fcpt.org)

    Yours for the Least in the Kingdom,

    Jeff Gilbertson

  • Heart Driven Worship

    We don’t downplay music in our gatherings but we have tried to re-learn worship as being first about a lifestyle and secondly about a heart that is longing for God. We call this heart-driven worship.

    We developed this term out of the conviction that most worship, as in “times of worship,” is music driven. In other words, congregations begin to worship and praise God when the praise and worship music begins. When the music ends, the worship ends as well. In many cases, the praise and worship experience is very much dependent on music to move our hearts toward God.

    In the extreme, we find ourselves more excited (towards God?) when the music is really good, and not as excited when the music is mediocre. We sometimes find that our worship intensifies when the music crescendos, and then dies down as the music fades. In this way, we have learned to allow music to determine our worship experience and have even become dependent upon it.

    We have decided to challenge this with the concept of “heart-driven” worship. This means that we want our worship to come out of our hearts engaging by faith with the reality of Jesus’ Presence in our midst. So… sometimes we facilitate this with music but sometimes not… We don’t want to be music dependent or driven. We learn to use simple spoken expressions of worship, quotes from Scripture, personal thanksgiving, even silence to express heart worship. In this way we learn that worship is all about the inclination of our hearts toward God in love and adoration.

    As we re-captured this sense that worship is more about the heart than about music we found that we could express and experience worship more naturally in all parts of our life. We also discovered that, even if we did enjoy worship WITH music, that the music didn’t have to be “good” by performance standards. Just scratchy, untuned voices with or without an instrument became very, very adequate because our hearts were driving the worship… not the music. In fact, we have come to appreciate very non-talent-oriented musical expressions and enjoy the raw desire behind the music more than the musical ability.

    Hamo challenges us even further after conversing with a non-Christian who simply was not a music lover. He asks this question:

    If its not part of his life to sing ‘pre-faith’ should we expect him to do it ‘post-faith’. Is singing an essential biblical requirement for worship or is it a cultural expression that can be taken or left depending on context?…

    There is a LOT of singing in the Bible – music has been called the ‘language of culture’ – but must churches sing?

    Some have said ‘once you know Jesus you can’t help but sing’. Maybe that’s true. Maybe we should expect new believers to pull in and become like us in this way?…

    Do you think?…

    Or have we become so attached to our singing that we just can’t conceive of worship taking any other form?

    Good stuff to think about.

    Don’t get me wrong. I am personally a lover of music in all and every form including most forms of secular music. I just plain love music. Yet it seems to me that worship and music have become intertwined in a way not intended. Worship is what all of life is really about. Music simply facilitates it.

  • The Pastor System

    I just couldn’t resist re-quoting this quote as posted at WaterCarriers on the pastor system:

    “There is nothing wrong about the pastor system, so far as I can see, except that it is not in the New Testament. Anything else that is not in the New Testament is as bad as the pastor, or the pastor system. If people deliberately decide that they will not follow the New Testament in religion, I do not know that it makes any difference where they go or what they do. It is rebellion against God to determine not to follow the New Testament, and there is nothing worse than that, unless the effort to follow the New Testament is entirely abandoned. There will be serious trouble in many unexpected places within the next few years.”

  • Blogging Friends

    One of the side benefits of taking up blogging has been the unexpected joy of making new friends. After posting the last entry about Jim Petersen’s book, The Insider, I received this email from a reader in Colorado:

    Hey Roger,
    If you don’t have a copy of Jim’s book, I’d be happy to mail one to you if you’re in the US. I have a few copies on my shelf that I keep for opportune moments such as this.

    Now that’s what I call friendly! There really is a type of digital community life… It’s very encouraging.

  • Friend Reaching

    I’ve been working my way through Jim Petersen’s book, “The Insider.” Actually, I ordered the workbook by mistake so I don’t actually have my hands on the book yet. But even the workbook has me intrigued.

    Petersen suggests that we are all “insiders” to families, neighborhoods, workplaces, and social networks. As insiders, our ministry is right in front of us. In fact, Petersen laments that so few of us realize both the importance and the legitimacy of learning how to minister to those who are in our immediate spheres of influence.

    He quotes Rodney Stark’s book “The Rise of Christianity”:

    The primary means of its [Christianity’s] growth was through the united and motivated efforts of the growing number of Christian believers who invited their friends, relatives, and neighbors to share the “good news.”

    The problem, over the past 1700 years of church history, is that ministry has become the domain of clergy and, therefore, this circle of ministry that surrounds each and every Christian remains largely untouched.

    Petersen doesn’t offer formulas for “reaching our neighbors,” rather he challenges us that:

    Being authentically and meaningfully involved with unbelievers takes time and commitment. It means growing in love and compassion. For some it means developing new understandings that will redefine ministry.

    I hope this has sparked some interest. I intend to continue reading the workbook and even the book once I get my hands on it.

  • Vision Process

    I like the “Vision” concepts shared by Justin Baeder at Radical Congruency. Take a look

Free Download of the Simple/House Church Revolution Book

Subscribe to Receive Posts by Email

Recent Posts:

Latest Comments:

  1. These are mere books of men using their knowledge, instead read the Holy Bible with prayer and the Holy spirit…

  2. hace dos años a tarves de la biblia mi manera de pensar frente al sistema tradicional de la iglesia, fue…

  3. At some point we have to use a correct translation of ekklesia, which could be assembly, a gathering of people…

  4. There is an element that is missing when this is applied to existing believers who are in a pulpit and…

  5. How can something so disobedient in every way be “life support’? The life of Christ lives in IC believers regardless…

Archives: