Simple Church Journal

  • House Church Basics — Part 1-A: What Is Church?

    Our first challenge in grasping what God intends church to be, is to stop looking at it through the lens of our background and through the lens of 2,000 years of “church” as a formal institution.

    Dee Hock says:

    "The problem is never how to get new, innovative thoughts into your mind, but how to get old ones out. Every mind is a building filled with archaic furniture. Clean out a corner of your mind, and creativity will instantly fill it."

    So our first challenge is to de-program old definitions and wrestle with some accurate new ones.

    Let’s start with a basic New Testament definition of church. The Greek word for “church” is “ekklesia” which simply refers to those who were "called out" for an assembly or meeting. It was a non-religious word. It just referred to a group of people. In this case, the group of people who were followers of Jesus.

    It really is and must be that simple!

    Church is not an organization, building, or meeting of any kind. It’s simply a group of people who follow Christ.

    Robert Fitts provides some additional information at DAWN ministries:

    Jesus used a common word when he said, "I will build my church." It was not a religious word. It simply meant a called out group, or crowd, or fellowship, or assembly. So we can use the word church when it communicates what we are saying, but we can also use the word fellowship, or gathering, or brethren, or saints, or disciples. It simply means a group of people.

    It’s very helpful to define “church” clearly. The temptation is to go around this issue and ask secondary questions: “How is church expressed?” “What will the gathering of believers look like when they come together?” But these are secondary questions!! We must be clear first of all what church is, then and only then can we understand how church is to be expressed.

    Church, in essence, is simply a collective group of followers.

    Consider this definition of church:

    A loose-knit network of Jesus followers who gather together to encourage each other in their spiritual life and who go out, moved by the Holy Spirit, sharing and demonstrating the Gospel.

    Loose-knit. Not formal membership, just a love-commitment to God and each other.

    Jesus followers. The basic requirement for membership in the church.

    Who gather together. Gathering to build one another up and to worship.

    Who go out. The purpose of believers… to GO with the message.

    Moved by the Holy Spirit. The one and only LEADER of the church.

    Sharing and demonstrating the gospel. The reason that the church GOES.

    Neither the church gatherings, nor the church’s “goings” had to have anything other than believers + the Holy Spirit. Nothing else was necessary for church to be church. Sometimes apostles were present, many times not. Sometimes elders were present, many times not. The church really is the followers of Jesus who engaged in gathering and going.

    As we think this through, I would like to suggest the reading of a “Description of a House Church.” This is an expression of church that is based upon, I believe, an accurate definition of “church.” This is not, by any means, the only expression of church. It’s just one of many. Early church gatherings and expressions were very diverse. But as you read this, ask yourself if it is built solidly on the definition of what church really is. Why? Why not? Click the link and read it!

    I would love to hear some reactions to both the definition of church presented here (loose-knit network of Jesus followers, etc… ) and this house church description.

    Go to Part 1-B: What Is Church?

    (House Church Blog is an interactive forum for house church, church planting, and related topics. Feel free to post comments!)

  • Blogging

    If you are newer to blogging… I just want to point you to my Blogging: How To.

    RSS feeds are changing the way some, including myself, are surfing the web. Many sites, including blogs, are offering regularly updated material or current news through “feeds” that can be gathered and looked at in one place. This is already discussed in the Blogging: How To article.

    It’s useful to note, however, that one can now gather information from many different sources depending on your interests. RSS feeds can bring you updates, not only on news and blogs, but also your hobbies, areas of interest, or just things you are currently studying or interested in. You can stay current or informed in many different areas easily. One directory for this is CompleteRss. You choose the feeds you want, or delete them if you no longer read them. This allows you to fully customize the information that comes at you. You are in control and the info you want is easily accesssible! Happy blogging!

  • Church Membership

    One of our energized discussions at church this weekend revolved around the concept of membership. We were aware that, even in a house church that does not have formal “membership,” it’s still possible to develop a subtle sense of “we” as opposed to “them.” We can find ourselves thinking that we are part of “this” church or “this kind of church” which becomes, in a sense, an informal membership badge. There is such a nasty little thing in each of us that seeks to be part of something “special.” We want a place to belong, a people to belong to, so we create unhealthy we-them-isms so that we can enjoy being the “we.”

    We decided that we wanted to be intentional about living and declaring a primary loyalty to the Body of Christ, not to any sub-group of the church. It’s not that we were promoting something else; we just realized that if we were not purposeful in this area, the tendency, even for organic house churches, is to drift into forms of worldly loyalty. We determined to actively and purposefully promote a THE church perspective rather than an OUR church one.

    So… as a starting point… I have a tentative “membership” statement to offer. It’s in rough form, but it may be something to build on as a tool for intentionally training ourselves and others in “membership”:

    • We affirm that we are, first and foremost, members of the one, true, universal church of Jesus Christ, also known as the Body of Christ. We affirm that we (as Christians) are members of the church and that no other membership is necessary. (Eph. 3:4-5)

    • We believe that the way Christianity is sometimes practiced today leads to worldly loyalties that can create unhealthy division and disharmony within the Body of Christ. We affirm that God wants the church to rise above man-made affinities. (1 Cor. 1:12-13)

    • We believe that Christians are to gather together for prayer, building one another up, breaking bread, and worship as often as possible. We affirm all types of such gatherings regardless of size, location, or who is present. We recognize that technology has broadened the possibilities for alternate ways to gather. (Acts 2:46-47)

    • We affirm the validity of every church expression and gathering without giving higher regard to any one type of gathering, time of gathering, place of gathering, or who is “officiating” (if anyone). (Eph. 4:25; 1 Cor. 14:26)

    I recognize that this is just a starting point. But I think it’s a useful dialogue. Suggestions?

    (House Church Blog is an interactive forum for house church, church planting, and related topics. Feel free to post comments.)

  • Church Planting Lessons

    Darren at Living Room posted 10 “Church Planting Lessons.” Here is an overview:

    1. DNA – Get some sort of DNA/Core Values etc together.
    2. Mission needs to be central.
    3. Read ‘The Shaping of Things to Come’ – by Alan Hirsch and Michael Frost. It is the best thing I’ve read written about missional church.
    4. Multiplication rather than Addition.
    5. Simplicity – Replica-table.
    6. Incarnation… because our approach to mission and church is incarnational.
    7. Sending vs Attractional approach.
    8. Participation is key.
    9. Community – Shared life.
    10. Have fun!

    Get the full scoop at his site.
    I would love to hear from others what they have learned in the process of planting churches!!!

    EmailMe.gif

  • House Church 101

    Beginning February 24:

    HouseChurchBasics.gif

    12 Interactive “Lessons” that will help us discuss many of the key components of house church:
    • What is church?
    • How participatory church funtions
    • How to be a missional church
    • The building blocks of community
    • What about leadership?
    • Worship and gatherings
    • More

  • Church Membership

    Terms You Will Not See In the Bible:
    • “This is my church.”
    • “I go to church.”
    • “I am a member of ‘such-and-such’ church.”
    • “I belong to the ‘such-and-such’ church.”
    • “I attend church.”
    • “I was accepted into membership at church.”
    • “My pastor.”
    • “Come to my church.”
    • “I changed churches.”

    Terms You Do See In the Bible:
    • “We are all one body…” (Eph. 4:4)
    • “There is only one Lord, one faith, one baptism…” (Eph. 4:5)
    • “Always keep yourselves united in the Holy Spirit…” (Eph. 4:3)
    • “You are members of God’s family.” (Eph. 2:19)
    • “For as members of one body you are all called to live in peace…” (Col. 3:15)
    • “…for we are all members of one body.” (Eph. 4:25)
    • “the church in Jerusalem,” “the church in Antioch” (Acts 11:22; 13:1)
    • “let us aim for harmony in the church…” (Rom. 14:19)
    • “Christ and the church are one.” (Eph. 5:32)

    We are all members of the church. Glory!

    (House Church Blog is an interactive forum for house church, church planting, and related topics. Feel free to post comments.)

  • The Present Future

    John White has passed along an excellent review of “The Present Future: Six Tough Questions for the Church” by Reggie McNeal.

    Following is John’s review:

    Reggie is a denominational guy. (He’s a consultant for the Southern Baptists.) He is writing to traditional church people but what he says is highly relevant to house church people as well. His insights are shocking (in a good sense).

    In each chapter, Reggie presents a “new reality” that the church must face. “Each reality requires the church to shift its thinking from answering the wrong question to pursuing the implications of a tough question.” (p.xvi)

    Here are a few quotes from Chapter One:

    (more…)

  • Why Change Church?

    Alan Creech seeks to answer the important question, “why we do church a different way.” His response is this:

    We have looked and we have seen the deep lack of real transformation going on in the Body of Christ. We aren’t – we haven’t been – being changed into the people we were created to be. And we have seen that the context of our Christian lives has had a good deal to do with this lack of transformation.

    I agree with Alan and would add that, not only are we not seeing transformation, we are not seeing the full expression of what Christ’s Body, family, community is meant to look like. The church is the expression of God’s people. The church is the people. The church ought to be the expression of the full diversity of God’s people and the community that they live in with each other. Instead, the church has often limited the expressions of God’s people, and the nature of community.

    In my own experience, I felt that God gave me the ability to run and the church offered me a track to run on– around and around. It took me many years to discover that, no, I was meant to run cross country… off the circular track. The church had no capacity to facilitate this diversity. It has limited the diversity of God’s people rather than served it.

    The first century church was not a static “thing,” rather, by defintion, it was a living, missional, people-movement. The church took it’s shape from the people who were being moved by the Spirit, seeking to live in relationship with God, fulfill His purposes, and live in love-one-another community. God’s diverse people, led by the Spirit (along with principles and truth), became the definition of what the church was. Structures accomodated the movement.

    In contrast, today, we usually see structure define the church. In this context, there is no room for the full and rich diversity of the “movement of the Spirit through God’s people.” What a tragic loss to both God’s people and the world God longs to touch. How sad it is to travel the globe and see the exact same church structures which now limit the movement (and the diverse expression of Christ through His people) rather than respond to it and support it.

    So… my added response to Alan’s comments about wanting to see God’s people transformed is: Yes, and amen. And… I long to see God more fully expressed through His people so that, indeed, His glory will cover the earth.

  • Small Is Beautiful

    I have been raised in a world that, in many ways, worships things that are big: big concerts, big events, big hypes, big companies, big shopping malls, etc., etc.

    Even in the church world, the watchword of the 90s was: mega-church. The bigger, the better!

    But after two small house church gatherings this weekend, I have been thinking of the beauty of small: flowers are small, babies are small, meaningful moments are often intimate and involving a small number of people, desserts are small, tears are small, hugs and kisses are small gestures (though large in meaning), diamonds are small, keepsakes are small, hearts are small…

    I have had to re-learn my own church traditions and background in order to grasp it: small church gatherings are incredibly beautiful. In fact, this past weekend I had the privilege of enjoying so many of these small beautiful things: hugs, kisses, tears, desserts, babies, flowers, and meaningful moments.

    I am so glad that I am learning to enjoy “small.”

  • House Church Networks vs. The Cell / Small-Group Church

    It is vital to understand that house church networks are not the same thing, in any way, as churches with small groups (even if those small groups are called “house churches.”

    The cell church (I will adopt the term “cell” church to refer to all types of small-group-based churches) has been a strong movement in North America over the past 30 years while the house church network is only just beginning to emerge.

    Nevertheless, in order to evaluate what God is doing in both of these streams it is very useful to recognize the differences:

    1. Within the house church network, each house church is fully, and completely real church. The attitude of the member comes out of an awareness that “I am the church.”

    The cell church is an extension of a larger church. It is a smaller piece, a ministry of, the larger, real church. The cell member tends to regard himself as one who “belongs to” the small group and is a “member of” the larger church.

    2. House churches do not ever need to build buildings. They can reproduce and multiply without ever requiring a building project.

    Cell churches are dependent on building structures to house the corporate church that meets weekly for celebration services.

    3. In the house church the small, weekly, home service is the priority. The extended family and the relationships that develop within the small home service are the most important part of church life. The larger celebration service with the entire house church network takes place less often and is, therefore, a lower priority.

    In the cell church the larger, weekly celebration service is the priority. If the church has to choose between the bigger all-church service or its cell groups, the big service wins.

    4. House church models a way of life and a set of values that is unique to its structure. Larry Kreider says that because church takes place entirely “outside of the mentality of religious meetings” it causes people to become “involved in a lifestyle of everyday community” in which people live their lives “in an extended spiritual family as they focus on reaching the lost.”

    The cell church tends to be an event (a good event) or a program that people attend. It certainly, vitally adds to the person’s life but would not normally lead to a “lifestyle of everyday community.”

    5. House churches and house church networks can multiply rapidly.

    Cells within the cell church tend to grow as a result of the corporate church itself growing (if it does).

    6. House churches are guided by spiritual “fathers” but are free to follow the agenda of Jesus in their midst.

    Cell churches are also often free to allow Jesus to shape the meeting and direction of the group, but they are also, just as often, set up with the agendas of the leaders of the corporate church.

    7. House church networks have a “flat” leadership structure. This means that as leaders are developed and churches planted, the leadership goes sideways and remains flat. In essence, churches and church leaders are continually sent out.

    Cell churches are designed with a hierarchical structure and administration so that leaders of cells are overseen by leaders of zones, who are overseen by pastoral staff, etc.

    8. House churches consume less resources on facilities and administration which frees up more resources for missions and Christian charities.

    Cell churches tend to consume most of the resources that come into the church on facilities and administrative needs.

    9. House churches develop elders, shepherds, ministers, and church planters. It quickly raises up and encourages these kinds of ministries. Every gift is equally valued as every person sees his or her gift used and valued within the context of real church.

    Cell churches develop home group leaders and encourage members to develop their gifts mostly for use within the small group. Often, these highly gifted people do not see themselves as ministering on the same level as the staff ministers in their church.

    10. The house church can meet anywhere and is encouraging the church to change from being a Come-structure to a Go-structure. It stops trying to bring people “into the church” and brings the church to people.

    The cell church is usually (not always) part of the larger church’s Come-structure, seeking to bring people into church and into small groups.

Free Download of the Simple/House Church Revolution Book

Subscribe to Receive Posts by Email

Recent Posts:

Latest Comments:

  1. These are mere books of men using their knowledge, instead read the Holy Bible with prayer and the Holy spirit…

  2. hace dos años a tarves de la biblia mi manera de pensar frente al sistema tradicional de la iglesia, fue…

  3. At some point we have to use a correct translation of ekklesia, which could be assembly, a gathering of people…

  4. There is an element that is missing when this is applied to existing believers who are in a pulpit and…

  5. How can something so disobedient in every way be “life support’? The life of Christ lives in IC believers regardless…

Archives: